Skip to content


Giova Vs. Rosenberg - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number379 U.S. 18
AppellantGiova
RespondentRosenberg
Excerpt:
giova v. rosenberg - 379 u.s. 18 (1964) u.s. supreme court giova v. rosenberg, 379 u.s. 18 (1964) 379 u.s. 18 giova v. rosenberg, district director, immigration and naturalization service. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. no. 23. decided october 26, 1964. judgment reversed and case remanded with directions to entertain the petition for review. reported below: 308 f.2d 347 . fred okrand for petitioner. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general miller and philip r. monahan for respondent. per curiam. upon consideration of the submission of the united states that the judgment of the court of appeals should be reversed and the cause remanded with directions to entertain the.....
Judgment:
GIOVA v. ROSENBERG - 379 U.S. 18 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court GIOVA v. ROSENBERG, 379 U.S. 18 (1964) 379 U.S. 18

GIOVA v. ROSENBERG, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION
SERVICE.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 23.
Decided October 26, 1964.

Judgment reversed and case remanded with directions to entertain the petition for review.

Reported below: 308 F.2d 347 .

Fred Okrand for petitioner.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Philip R. Monahan for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the submission of the United States that the judgment of the Court of Appeals should be reversed and the cause remanded with directions to entertain the petition for review, and upon examination of the entire record, the judgment is reversed and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions to entertain the petition for review.

Page 379 U.S. 18, 19




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //