Skip to content


Tancil Vs. Woolls - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number379 U.S. 19
AppellantTancil
RespondentWoolls
Excerpt:
.....united states district court for the eastern district of virginia. no. 386. decided october 26, 1964. * [ footnote * ] together with no. 412, virginia board of elections et al. v. hamm et al., also on appeal from the same court. 230 f. supp. 156, affirmed. allison w. brown, jr., for appellants in no. 386 and for appellees in no. 412. robert y. button, attorney general of virginia, r. d. mcilwaine iii, assistant attorney general, william j. hassan and ralph g. louk for appellants in no. 412. per curiam. the motion to affirm in no. 412 is granted and the judgment in both cases is affirmed. mr. justice harlan is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in both cases. mr. justice brennan is of the opinion that probable.....
Judgment:
TANCIL v. WOOLLS - 379 U.S. 19 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court TANCIL v. WOOLLS, 379 U.S. 19 (1964) 379 U.S. 19

TANCIL ET AL. v. WOOLLS ET AL., JUDGES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
VIRGINIA. No. 386.
Decided October 26, 1964. *

[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 412, Virginia Board of Elections et al. v. Hamm et al., also on appeal from the same court.

230 F. Supp. 156, affirmed.

Allison W. Brown, Jr., for appellants in No. 386 and for appellees in No. 412.

Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia, R. D. McIlwaine III, Assistant Attorney General, William J. Hassan and Ralph G. Louk for appellants in No. 412.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm in No. 412 is granted and the judgment in both cases is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in both cases.

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in No. 386.

Page 379 U.S. 19, 20




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //