Skip to content


Alhambra Trucking Vs. Public Utilities Comm., California - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number379 U.S. 14
AppellantAlhambra Trucking
RespondentPublic Utilities Comm., California
Excerpt:
..... appeal from the supreme court of california. no. 288. decided october 19, 1964. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. frederick m. rowe for appellants. mary moran pajalich for appellee. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 379 u.s. 14, 15 safeway trails, v. furman, 379 u.s. 14 (1964) 379 u.s. 14 (1964) "> u.s. supreme court safeway trails, v. furman, 379 u.s. 14 (1964) 379 u.s. 14 safeway trails, inc. v. furman et al. appeal from the supreme court of new jersey. no. 228. decided october 19, 1964. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 41 n. j. 467, 197 a. 2d 366. william a. roberts.....
Judgment:
ALHAMBRA TRUCKING v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM., CALIFORNIA - 379 U.S. 14 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court ALHAMBRA TRUCKING v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM., CALIFORNIA, 379 U.S. 14 (1964) 379 U.S. 14

ALHAMBRA TRUCKING CO. ET AL. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 288.
Decided October 19, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Frederick M. Rowe for appellants.

Mary Moran Pajalich for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 379 U.S. 14, 15


SAFEWAY TRAILS, v. FURMAN, <a href="/100775"> 379 U.S. 14 </a> (1964) 379 U.S. 14 (1964) "> U.S. Supreme Court SAFEWAY TRAILS, v. FURMAN, 379 U.S. 14 (1964) 379 U.S. 14

SAFEWAY TRAILS, INC. v. FURMAN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 228.
Decided October 19, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 41 N. J. 467, 197 A. 2d 366.

William A. Roberts and Morris J. Levin for appellant.

Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Alan B. Handler, First Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //