Skip to content


Drews Vs. Maryland - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number378 U.S. 547
AppellantDrews
RespondentMaryland
Excerpt:
.....thomas b. finan, attorney general of maryland, and joseph s. kaufman, deputy attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the court of appeals of maryland for consideration in light of griffin v. maryland, ante, p. 130, and bell v. maryland, ante, p. 226. mr. justice douglas would reverse outright on the basis of the views expressed in his opinion in bell v. maryland, ante, p. 242. mr. justice black, mr. justice harlan and mr. justice white dissent. page 378 u.s. 547, 548
Judgment:
DREWS v. MARYLAND - 378 U.S. 547 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court DREWS v. MARYLAND, 378 U.S. 547 (1964) 378 U.S. 547

DREWS ET AL. v. MARYLAND.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 3.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Judgment vacated and case remanded.

Reported below: 224 Md. 186, 167 A. 2d 341.

Robert B. Watts, Francis D. Murnaghan, Jr. and Jack Greenberg for appellants.

Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General of Maryland, and Joseph S. Kaufman, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals of Maryland for consideration in light of Griffin v. Maryland, ante, p. 130, and Bell v. Maryland, ante, p. 226.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS would reverse outright on the basis of the views expressed in his opinion in Bell v. Maryland, ante, p. 242.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent.

Page 378 U.S. 547, 548




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //