Skip to content


Del Hoyo Vs. New York - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number378 U.S. 570
AppellantDel Hoyo
RespondentNew York
Excerpt:
.....and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment of the appellate division of the supreme court of new york, first judicial department, is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this court in jackson v. denno, ante, p. 368. mr. justice black, mr. justice clark, mr. justice harlan and mr. justice stewart dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in jackson v. denno, supra. page 378 u.s. 570, 571
Judgment:
DEL HOYO v. NEW YORK - 378 U.S. 570 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court DEL HOYO v. NEW YORK, 378 U.S. 570 (1964) 378 U.S. 570

DEL HOYO v. NEW YORK.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPREME COURT
OF NEW YORK, FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 893, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Leon B. Polsky and Edward A. Miller for petitioner.

Isidore Dollinger and Irving Anolik for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.

Page 378 U.S. 570, 571




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //