Skip to content


Harris Vs. Texas - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number378 U.S. 572
AppellantHarris
RespondentTexas
Excerpt:
.....judgment vacated; and case remanded. reported below: 370 s. w. 2d 886. marian s. rosen for petitioner. carl e. f. dally for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment of the court of criminal appeals of texas is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this court in jackson v. denno, ante, p. 368. mr. justice black, mr. justice clark, mr. justice harlan and mr. justice stewart dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in jackson v. denno, supra. page 378 u.s. 572, 573
Judgment:
HARRIS v. TEXAS - 378 U.S. 572 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court HARRIS v. TEXAS, 378 U.S. 572 (1964) 378 U.S. 572

HARRIS v. TEXAS.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF
TEXAS. No. 963, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 370 S. W. 2d 886.

Marian S. Rosen for petitioner.

Carl E. F. Dally for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.

Page 378 U.S. 572, 573




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //