Skip to content


Mayer Vs. Rusk - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number378 U.S. 579
AppellantMayer
RespondentRusk
Excerpt:
mayer v. rusk - 378 u.s. 579 (1964) u.s. supreme court mayer v. rusk, 378 u.s. 579 (1964) 378 u.s. 579 mayer v. rusk, secretary of state. appeal from the united states district court for the district of columbia. no. 746. decided june 22, 1964. judgment vacated and case remanded. reported below: 224 f. supp. 929. david carliner, francis heisler, oliver stone and jack wasserman for appellant. solicitor general cox for appellee. per curiam. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court for consideration in light of aptheker v. secretary of state, ante, p. 500. mr. justice clark, mr. justice harlan and mr. justice white would affirm the judgment. page 378 u.s. 579, 580
Judgment:
MAYER v. RUSK - 378 U.S. 579 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court MAYER v. RUSK, 378 U.S. 579 (1964) 378 U.S. 579

MAYER v. RUSK, SECRETARY OF STATE.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
No. 746.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Judgment vacated and case remanded.

Reported below: 224 F. Supp. 929.

David Carliner, Francis Heisler, Oliver Stone and Jack Wasserman for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for consideration in light of Aptheker v. Secretary of State, ante, p. 500.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE would affirm the judgment.

Page 378 U.S. 579, 580




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //