Skip to content


Mitchell Bros. Truck Lines Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number378 U.S. 125
AppellantMitchell Bros. Truck Lines
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
..... per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. dunne leases cars & trucks, inc. v. lussier, 378 u.s. 125 (1964) 378 u.s. 125 (1964) "> u.s. supreme court dunne leases cars & trucks, inc. v. lussier, 378 u.s. 125 (1964) 378 u.s. 125 dunne leases cars & trucks, inc., v. lussier, registrar of motor vehicles for rhode island. appeal from the superior court of rhode island, providence county. no. 1029. decided june 15, 1964. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: see ___ r. i. ___, 196 a. 2d 728. abraham belilove and samuel j. kolodney for appellant. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. .....
Judgment:
MITCHELL BROS. TRUCK LINES v. UNITED STATES - 378 U.S. 125 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court MITCHELL BROS. TRUCK LINES v. UNITED STATES, 378 U.S. 125 (1964) 378 U.S. 125

MITCHELL BROS. TRUCK LINES v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON.
No. 993.
Decided June 15, 1964.

225 F. Supp. 755, affirmed.

William F. White for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane, Francis A. Silver and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


DUNNE LEASES CARS & TRUCKS, INC. v. LUSSIER, <a href="/100858"> 378 U.S. 125 </a> (1964) 378 U.S. 125 (1964) "> U.S. Supreme Court DUNNE LEASES CARS & TRUCKS, INC. v. LUSSIER, 378 U.S. 125 (1964) 378 U.S. 125

DUNNE LEASES CARS & TRUCKS, INC., v. LUSSIER, REGISTRAR OF MOTOR VEHICLES
FOR RHODE ISLAND.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF RHODE ISLAND, PROVIDENCE COUNTY. No. 1029.
Decided June 15, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: See ___ R. I. ___, 196 A. 2d 728.

Abraham Belilove and Samuel J. Kolodney for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 378 U.S. 125, 126




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //