Skip to content


Benko Vs. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number378 U.S. 126
AppellantBenko
RespondentHartford Accident and Indemnity Co.
Excerpt:
benko v. hartford accident & indemnity co. - 378 u.s. 126 (1964) u.s. supreme court benko v. hartford accident & indemnity co., 378 u.s. 126 (1964) 378 u.s. 126 benko v. hartford accident & indemnity co. et al. appeal from the court of appeals of maryland. no. 1345, misc. decided june 15, 1964. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 231 md. 419, 190 a. 2d 638. appellant pro se. cornelius h. doherty for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 378 u.s. 126, 127
Judgment:
BENKO v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY CO. - 378 U.S. 126 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court BENKO v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY CO., 378 U.S. 126 (1964) 378 U.S. 126

BENKO v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 1345, Misc.
Decided June 15, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 231 Md. 419, 190 A. 2d 638.

Appellant pro se.

Cornelius H. Doherty for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 378 U.S. 126, 127




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //