Skip to content


Curtis, Inc. Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number378 U.S. 128
AppellantCurtis, Inc.
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
curtis, inc. v. united states - 378 u.s. 128 (1964) u.s. supreme court curtis, inc. v. united states, 378 u.s. 128 (1964) 378 u.s. 128 curtis, inc., et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of colorado. no. 1033. decided june 15, 1964. 225 f. supp. 894, affirmed. duane w. acklie, donald e. leonard and anthony f. zarlengo for appellants. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general orrick, lionel kestenbaum, robert w. ginnane and arthur j. cerra for the united states and the interstate commerce commission. thomas f. kilroy for denver-albuquerque motor transport, inc., et al., appellees. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. .....
Judgment:
CURTIS, INC. v. UNITED STATES - 378 U.S. 128 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court CURTIS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 378 U.S. 128 (1964) 378 U.S. 128

CURTIS, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO.
No. 1033.
Decided June 15, 1964.

225 F. Supp. 894, affirmed.

Duane W. Acklie, Donald E. Leonard and Anthony F. Zarlengo for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and Arthur J. Cerra for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.

Thomas F. Kilroy for Denver-Albuquerque Motor Transport, Inc., et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 378 U.S. 128, 129




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //