Skip to content


Catanzaro Vs. New York - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number378 U.S. 573
AppellantCatanzaro
RespondentNew York
Excerpt:
.....and case remanded. reported below: 13 n. y. 2d 842, 192 n. e. 2d 232. petitioner pro se. frank s. hogan and h. richard uviller for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment of the court of appeals of new york is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this court in jackson v. denno, ante, p. 368. mr. justice black, mr. justice clark, mr. justice harlan and mr. justice stewart dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in jackson v. denno, supra. page 378 u.s. 573, 574
Judgment:
CATANZARO v. NEW YORK - 378 U.S. 573 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court CATANZARO v. NEW YORK, 378 U.S. 573 (1964) 378 U.S. 573

CATANZARO v. NEW YORK.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 994, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 13 N. Y. 2d 842, 192 N. E. 2d 232.

Petitioner pro se.

Frank S. Hogan and H. Richard Uviller for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals of New York is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.

Page 378 U.S. 573, 574




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //