Skip to content


Owen Vs. Arizona - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number378 U.S. 574
AppellantOwen
RespondentArizona
Excerpt:
owen v. arizona - 378 u.s. 574 (1964) u.s. supreme court owen v. arizona, 378 u.s. 574 (1964) 378 u.s. 574 owen et al. v. arizona. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of arizona. no. 1078, misc. decided june 22, 1964. certiorari granted; judgments vacated; and case remanded. reported below: 94 ariz. 404, 385 p.2d 700; 94 ariz. 413, 385 p.2d 706. petitioners pro se. robert w. pickrell, attorney general of arizona, and norman e. green for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgments of the supreme court of arizona are vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of.....
Judgment:
OWEN v. ARIZONA - 378 U.S. 574 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court OWEN v. ARIZONA, 378 U.S. 574 (1964) 378 U.S. 574

OWEN ET AL. v. ARIZONA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
No. 1078, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Certiorari granted; judgments vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 94 Ariz. 404, 385 P.2d 700; 94 Ariz. 413, 385 P.2d 706.

Petitioners pro se.

Robert W. Pickrell, Attorney General of Arizona, and Norman E. Green for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgments of the Supreme Court of Arizona are vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.

Page 378 U.S. 574, 575




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //