Skip to content


Williams Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number377 U.S. 404
AppellantWilliams
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
williams v. united states - 377 u.s. 404 (1964) u.s. supreme court williams v. united states, 377 u.s. 404 (1964) 377 u.s. 404 williams v. united states et al. appeal from the united states court of appeals for the sixth circuit. no. 1022, misc. decided june 1, 1964. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 377 u.s. 404, 405 union oil co. v. state board of equalization of cal., 377 u.s. 404 (1964) 377 u.s. 404 (1964) "> u.s. supreme court union oil co. v. state board of equalization of cal., 377 u.s. 404 (1964) .....
Judgment:
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES - 377 U.S. 404 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES, 377 U.S. 404 (1964) 377 U.S. 404

WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
No. 1022, Misc.
Decided June 1, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 377 U.S. 404, 405


UNION OIL CO. v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OF CAL., <a href="/100884"> 377 U.S. 404 </a> (1964) 377 U.S. 404 (1964) "> U.S. Supreme Court UNION OIL CO. v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OF CAL., 377 U.S. 404 (1964) 377 U.S. 404

UNION OIL CO. OF CALIFORNIA v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OF CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 968.
Decided June 1, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 60 Cal. 2d 441, 386 P.2d 496.

Hart H. Spiegel for appellant.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Dan Kaufmann, Assistant Attorney General, and Ernest P. Goodman and John J. Klee, Jr., Deputy Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //