Skip to content


Zapata Vs. California - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number377 U.S. 406
AppellantZapata
RespondentCalifornia
Excerpt:
.....the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 377 u.s. 406, 407 .....
Judgment:
ZAPATA v. CALIFORNIA - 377 U.S. 406 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court ZAPATA v. CALIFORNIA, 377 U.S. 406 (1964) 377 U.S. 406

ZAPATA v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD
APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 1025, Misc.
Decided June 1, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 220 Cal. App. 2d 903, 34 Cal. Rptr. 171.

Samuel Carter McMorris for appellant.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Roger E. Venturi, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 377 U.S. 406, 407




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //