Skip to content


Lynchburg Traffic Bureau Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number377 U.S. 270
AppellantLynchburg Traffic Bureau
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
lynchburg traffic bureau v. united states - 377 u.s. 270 (1964) u.s. supreme court lynchburg traffic bureau v. united states, 377 u.s. 270 (1964) 377 u.s. 270 lynchburg traffic bureau v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the western district of virginia. no. 931. decided may 25, 1964. 225 f. supp. 874, affirmed. w. g. burnette for appellant. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general orrick, robert b. hummel, arthur j. murphy, jr., robert w. ginnane and thomas h. ploss for the united states and the interstate commerce commission. martin a. meyer, jr., robert b. claytor and john w. hanifin for rail appellees. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is.....
Judgment:
LYNCHBURG TRAFFIC BUREAU v. UNITED STATES - 377 U.S. 270 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court LYNCHBURG TRAFFIC BUREAU v. UNITED STATES, 377 U.S. 270 (1964) 377 U.S. 270

LYNCHBURG TRAFFIC BUREAU v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT
OF VIRGINIA. No. 931.
Decided May 25, 1964.

225 F. Supp. 874, affirmed.

W. G. Burnette for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Arthur J. Murphy, Jr., Robert W. Ginnane and Thomas H. Ploss for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.

Martin A. Meyer, Jr., Robert B. Claytor and John W. Hanifin for rail appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 377 U.S. 270, 271




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //