Skip to content


Marks Vs. Esperdy - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number377 U.S. 214
AppellantMarks
RespondentEsperdy
Excerpt:
.....esperdy, 377 u.s. 214 (1964) 377 u.s. 214 marks v. esperdy, district director, immigration and naturalization service. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit. no. 253. argued april 2, 1964. decided may 18, 1964. 315 f.2d 673 , affirmed by an equally divided court. murray a. gordon argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. charles gordon argued the cause for respondent. with him on the brief were solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general miller and l. paul winings. per curiam. the judgment is affirmed by an equally divided court. mr. justice brennan took no part in the decision of this case. page 377 u.s. 214, 215
Judgment:
MARKS v. ESPERDY - 377 U.S. 214 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court MARKS v. ESPERDY, 377 U.S. 214 (1964) 377 U.S. 214

MARKS v. ESPERDY, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION
SERVICE.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 253.
Argued April 2, 1964.
Decided May 18, 1964.

315 F.2d 673 , affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Murray A. Gordon argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.

Charles Gordon argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and L. Paul Winings.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN took no part in the decision of this case.

Page 377 U.S. 214, 215




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //