Skip to content


Sanders Vs. Alabama - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number377 U.S. 125
AppellantSanders
RespondentAlabama
Excerpt:
sanders v. alabama - 377 u.s. 125 (1964) u.s. supreme court sanders v. alabama, 377 u.s. 125 (1964) 377 u.s. 125 sanders v. alabama. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of alabama. no. 856, misc. decided april 20, 1964. certiorari granted and judgment reversed. petitioner pro se. richmond m. flowers, attorney general of alabama, and david w. clark, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is reversed. gideon v. wainwright, 372 u.s. 335 ; draper v. washington, 372 u.s. 487 ; douglas v. california, 372 u.s. 353 . page 377 u.s. 125, 126
Judgment:
SANDERS v. ALABAMA - 377 U.S. 125 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court SANDERS v. ALABAMA, 377 U.S. 125 (1964) 377 U.S. 125

SANDERS v. ALABAMA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA.
No. 856, Misc.
Decided April 20, 1964.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Petitioner pro se.

Richmond M. Flowers, Attorney General of Alabama, and David W. Clark, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 ; Draper v. Washington, 372 U.S. 487 ; Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 .

Page 377 U.S. 125, 126




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //