Skip to content


Telephone News System, Inc. Vs. Illinois Bell Telephone - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number376 U.S. 782
AppellantTelephone News System, Inc.
Respondentillinois Bell Telephone
Excerpt:
telephone news system, inc. v. illinois bell telephone - 376 u.s. 782 (1964) u.s. supreme court telephone news system, inc. v. illinois bell telephone, 376 u.s. 782 (1964) 376 u.s. 782 telephone news system, inc., v. illinois bell telephone co. et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of illinois. no. 772. decided april 6, 1964. 220 f. supp. 621, affirmed. thomas d. nash, jr. for appellant. solicitor general cox for the united states, and walter j. cummings, jr. for illinois bell telephone co., appellees. per curiam. the judgment is affirmed. mr. justice douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. page 376 u.s. 782, 783
Judgment:
TELEPHONE NEWS SYSTEM, INC. v. ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE - 376 U.S. 782 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court TELEPHONE NEWS SYSTEM, INC. v. ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE, 376 U.S. 782 (1964) 376 U.S. 782

TELEPHONE NEWS SYSTEM, INC., v. ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS. No. 772.
Decided April 6, 1964.

220 F. Supp. 621, affirmed.

Thomas D. Nash, Jr. for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox for the United States, and Walter J. Cummings, Jr. for Illinois Bell Telephone Co., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 376 U.S. 782, 783




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //