Skip to content


Carter Vs. Florida - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number376 U.S. 648
AppellantCarter
RespondentFlorida
Excerpt:
..... appeal from the supreme court of florida. no. 817. decided march 30, 1964. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 155 so.2d 787. hal s. ives for appellant. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 376 u.s. 648, 649 suburban telephone v. mountain states telephone, tele., 376 u.s. 648 (1964) 376 u.s. 648 (1964) "> u.s. supreme court suburban telephone v. mountain states telephone, tele., 376 u.s. 648 (1964) 376 u.s. 648 suburban telephone co. v. mountain states telephone & telegraph co. et al. appeal from the supreme court of new mexico. no. 800. decided march 30, 1964. appeal dismissed and.....
Judgment:
CARTER v. FLORIDA - 376 U.S. 648 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court CARTER v. FLORIDA, 376 U.S. 648 (1964) 376 U.S. 648

CARTER v. FLORIDA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 817.
Decided March 30, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 155 So.2d 787.

Hal S. Ives for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 376 U.S. 648, 649


SUBURBAN TELEPHONE v. MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE, TELE., <a href="/100941"> 376 U.S. 648 </a> (1964) 376 U.S. 648 (1964) "> U.S. Supreme Court SUBURBAN TELEPHONE v. MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE, TELE., 376 U.S. 648 (1964) 376 U.S. 648

SUBURBAN TELEPHONE CO. v. MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO.
No. 800.
Decided March 30, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 72 N. M. 411, 384 P.2d 684.

J. Kenneth Baird and Robert A. Sprecher for appellant.

J. H. Shepherd for Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co., and Julian S. Ertz for Tadlock et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //