Skip to content


Auclair Transportation, Inc. Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number376 U.S. 514
AppellantAuclair Transportation, Inc.
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
auclair transportation, inc. v. united states - 376 u.s. 514 (1964) u.s. supreme court auclair transportation, inc. v. united states, 376 u.s. 514 (1964) 376 u.s. 514 auclair transportation, inc., et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of massachusetts. no. 724. decided march 23, 1964. 221 f. supp. 328, affirmed. peter t. beardsley and richard r. sigmon for appellants. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general orrick, lionel kestenbaum, robert w. ginnane and h. neil garson for the united states and the interstate commerce commission; and william j. taylor for railway express agency, inc., appellees. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is.....
Judgment:
AUCLAIR TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. UNITED STATES - 376 U.S. 514 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court AUCLAIR TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 376 U.S. 514 (1964) 376 U.S. 514

AUCLAIR TRANSPORTATION, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS. No. 724.
Decided March 23, 1964.

221 F. Supp. 328, affirmed.

Peter T. Beardsley and Richard R. Sigmon for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission; and William J. Taylor for Railway Express Agency, Inc., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 376 U.S. 514, 515




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //