Skip to content


Lord Vs. Winchester Star - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number376 U.S. 221
AppellantLord
RespondentWinchester Star
Excerpt:
.....a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 376 u.s. 221, 222 kreznar v. united states, 376 u.s. 221 (1964) 376 u.s. 221 (1964) "> u.s. supreme court kreznar v. united states, 376 u.s. 221 (1964) 376 u.s. 221 kreznar et al. v. united states. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of claims. no. 85. decided march 2, 1964. certiorari granted and judgment reversed. sidney dickstein, david i. shapiro and george kaufmann for petitioners. solicitor general cox, acting assistant attorney general douglas and alan s. rosenthal for the united states. per curiam. the petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. greene v. united states, ante, p. 149. .....
Judgment:
LORD v. WINCHESTER STAR - 376 U.S. 221 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court LORD v. WINCHESTER STAR, 376 U.S. 221 (1964) 376 U.S. 221

LORD v. WINCHESTER STAR ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS.
No. 732.
Decided March 2, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 346 Mass. 764, 190 N. E. 2d 875.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 376 U.S. 221, 222


KREZNAR v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/100969"> 376 U.S. 221 </a> (1964) 376 U.S. 221 (1964) "> U.S. Supreme Court KREZNAR v. UNITED STATES, 376 U.S. 221 (1964) 376 U.S. 221

KREZNAR ET AL. v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF CLAIMS.
No. 85.
Decided March 2, 1964.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Sidney Dickstein, David I. Shapiro and George Kaufmann for petitioners.

Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Douglas and Alan S. Rosenthal for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Greene v. United States, ante, p. 149.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Greene v. United States, ante, p. 164.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //