Skip to content


Diamond Vs. Louisiana - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number376 U.S. 201
AppellantDiamond
RespondentLouisiana
Excerpt:
diamond v. louisiana - 376 u.s. 201 (1964) u.s. supreme court diamond v. louisiana, 376 u.s. 201 (1964) 376 u.s. 201 diamond v. louisiana. certiorari to the supreme court of louisiana. no. 100. argued february 20, 1964. decided february 24, 1964. certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted. james m. nabrit iii argued the cause for petitioner. with him on the brief were jack greenberg, wiley a. branton and johnnie a. jones. ralph l. roy argued the cause for respondent. with him on the brief was jack p. f. gremillion, attorney general of louisiana. per curiam. the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. page 376 u.s. 201, 202
Judgment:
DIAMOND v. LOUISIANA - 376 U.S. 201 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court DIAMOND v. LOUISIANA, 376 U.S. 201 (1964) 376 U.S. 201

DIAMOND v. LOUISIANA.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 100.
Argued February 20, 1964.
Decided February 24, 1964.

Certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.

James M. Nabrit III argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Jack Greenberg, Wiley A. Branton and Johnnie A. Jones.

Ralph L. Roy argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Page 376 U.S. 201, 202




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //