Skip to content


Brazosport Savings and Loan Association Vs. Phillips - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number375 U.S. 438
AppellantBrazosport Savings and Loan Association
RespondentPhillips
Excerpt:
.....et al. appeal from the supreme court of texas. no. 565. decided january 13, 1964. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 366 s. w. 2d 929. john j. mckay for appellants. waggoner carr, attorney general of texas, joe r. long and howard w. mays, assistant attorneys general, edward clark and martin harris for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. stickler v. ohio, 375 u.s. 438 (1964) 375 u.s. 438 (1964) "> u.s. supreme court stickler v. ohio, 375 u.s. 438 (1964) 375 u.s. 438 stickler v. ohio. appeal from the supreme court of ohio. no. 601. decided january 13, 1964. .....
Judgment:
BRAZOSPORT SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION v. PHILLIPS - 375 U.S. 438 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court BRAZOSPORT SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION v. PHILLIPS, 375 U.S. 438 (1964) 375 U.S. 438

BRAZOSPORT SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION ET AL. v. PHILLIPS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS.
No. 565.
Decided January 13, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 366 S. W. 2d 929.

John J. McKay for appellants.

Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, Joe R. Long and Howard W. Mays, Assistant Attorneys General, Edward Clark and Martin Harris for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


STICKLER v. OHIO, <a href="/100997"> 375 U.S. 438 </a> (1964) 375 U.S. 438 (1964) "> U.S. Supreme Court STICKLER v. OHIO, 375 U.S. 438 (1964) 375 U.S. 438

STICKLER v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 601.
Decided January 13, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 174 Ohio St. 382, 189 N. E. 2d 433.

Jack G. Day for appellant.

Fred Cartolano for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 375 U.S. 438, 439




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //