Skip to content


Blaikie Vs. Power - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number375 U.S. 439
AppellantBlaikie
RespondentPower
Excerpt:
.....al. appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 617. decided january 13, 1964. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 13 n. y. 2d 134, 193 n. e. 2d 55. harry h. lipsig for appellant. leo a. larkin, seymour b. quel and joel l. cohen for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. pennington v. city of corpus christi, 375 u.s. 439 (1964) 375 u.s. 439 (1964) "> u.s. supreme court pennington v. city of corpus christi, 375 u.s. 439 (1964) 375 u.s. 439 pennington et al. v. city of corpus christi et al. appeal from the court of civil appeals of texas, fourth supreme judicial .....
Judgment:
BLAIKIE v. POWER - 375 U.S. 439 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court BLAIKIE v. POWER, 375 U.S. 439 (1964) 375 U.S. 439

BLAIKIE v. POWER ET AL., CONSTITUTING BOARD OF ELECTIONS, CITY OF
NEW YORK, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 617.
Decided January 13, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 13 N. Y. 2d 134, 193 N. E. 2d 55.

Harry H. Lipsig for appellant.

Leo A. Larkin, Seymour B. Quel and Joel L. Cohen for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


PENNINGTON v. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, <a href="/100998"> 375 U.S. 439 </a> (1964) 375 U.S. 439 (1964) "> U.S. Supreme Court PENNINGTON v. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, 375 U.S. 439 (1964) 375 U.S. 439

PENNINGTON ET AL. v. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF TEXAS, FOURTH SUPREME JUDICIAL
DISTRICT. No. 621.
Decided January 13, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 363 S. W. 2d 502.

Sidney P. Chandler for appellants.

I. M. Singer for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 375 U.S. 439, 440




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //