Skip to content


Ratigan Vs. Davis - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number375 U.S. 394
AppellantRatigan
RespondentDavis
Excerpt:
.....al. appeal from the supreme court of nebraska. no. 547. decided january 6, 1964. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 175 neb. 416, 122 n. w. 2d 12. benjamin m. wall for appellants. william r. king and seymour l. smith for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. spatt v. city of new york, 375 u.s. 394 (1964) 375 u.s. 394 (1964) "> u.s. supreme court spatt v. city of new york, 375 u.s. 394 (1964) 375 u.s. 394 spatt v. city of new york et al. appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 562. decided january 6, 1964. appeal dismissed for want of a.....
Judgment:
RATIGAN v. DAVIS - 375 U.S. 394 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court RATIGAN v. DAVIS, 375 U.S. 394 (1964) 375 U.S. 394

RATIGAN ET AL. v. DAVIS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA.
No. 547.
Decided January 6, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 175 Neb. 416, 122 N. W. 2d 12.

Benjamin M. Wall for appellants.

William R. King and Seymour L. Smith for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


SPATT v. CITY OF NEW YORK, <a href="/101008"> 375 U.S. 394 </a> (1964) 375 U.S. 394 (1964) "> U.S. Supreme Court SPATT v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 375 U.S. 394 (1964) 375 U.S. 394

SPATT v. CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 562.
Decided January 6, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 13 N. Y. 2d 618, 191 N. E. 2d 91.

Charles E. Bernstein for appellant.

Leo A. Larkin, Stanley Buchsbaum and Solomon Portnow for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 375 U.S. 394, 395




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //