Skip to content


U.S. Vs. First National City Bank. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number377 U.S. 951
AppellantU.S.
RespondentFirst National City Bank.
Excerpt:
u.s. v. first national city bank. - 377 u.s. 951 (1964) u.s. supreme court u.s. v. first national city bank. , 377 u.s. 951 (1964) 377 u.s. 951 united states, petitioner, v. first national city bank. no. 998. supreme court of the united states june 1, 1964 solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general oberdorfer and harold c. wilkenfeld, for the united states. henry harfield, for respondent. edward j. ross, for chase manhattan bank and others, as amici curiae. facts and opinion, u. s. v. omar, s.a., d.c., 210 f.supp. 773; 321 f.2d 14 ; 325 f.2d 1020 . petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit granted and case placed on the summary calendar.[ u.s. v. first.....
Judgment:
U.S. v. FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK. - 377 U.S. 951 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court U.S. v. FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK. , 377 U.S. 951 (1964)

377 U.S. 951

UNITED STATES, petitioner,
v.
FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK.
No. 998.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 1, 1964

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Harold C. Wilkenfeld, for the United States.

Henry Harfield, for respondent.

Edward J. Ross, for Chase Manhattan Bank and others, as amici curiae.

Facts and opinion, U. S. v. Omar, S.A., D.C., 210 F.Supp. 773; 321 F.2d 14 ; 325 F.2d 1020 .

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted and case placed on the summary calendar.[ U.S. v. First National City Bank. 377 U.S. 951 (1964) ]


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //