Skip to content


Travia Vs. Lomenzo - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number382 U.S. 287
AppellantTravia
RespondentLomenzo
Excerpt:
.....382 u.s. 287 (1965) u.s. supreme court travia v. lomenzo, 382 u.s. 287 (1965) 382 u.s. 287 travia et al. v. lomenzo, secretary of state of new york, et al. appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of new york. no. 633. decided december 13, 1965. affirmed. simon h. rifkind, edward n. costikyan and leo a. larkin for appellants. louis j. lefkowitz, attorney general of new york, daniel m. cohen, assistant solicitor general, donald zimmerman, special assistant attorney general, george d. zuckerman, assistant attorney general, and willis burton lemon for appellees. per curiam. the judgment is affirmed. mr. justice harlan concurs in the result for the reasons stated in his acquiescence to the affirmance.....
Judgment:
TRAVIA v. LOMENZO - 382 U.S. 287 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court TRAVIA v. LOMENZO, 382 U.S. 287 (1965) 382 U.S. 287

TRAVIA ET AL. v. LOMENZO, SECRETARY OF STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 633.
Decided December 13, 1965.

Affirmed.

Simon H. Rifkind, Edward N. Costikyan and Leo A. Larkin for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Daniel M. Cohen, Assistant Solicitor General, Donald Zimmerman, Special Assistant Attorney General, George D. Zuckerman, Assistant Attorney General, and Willis Burton Lemon for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN concurs in the result for the reasons stated in his acquiescence to the affirmance of the judgment in Travia v. Lomenzo, ante, p. 4, at 8.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 382 U.S. 287, 288




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //