Skip to content


United States Vs. Huck Manufacturing Co. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number382 U.S. 197
AppellantUnited States
RespondentHuck Manufacturing Co.
Excerpt:
united states v. huck manufacturing co. - 382 u.s. 197 (1965) u.s. supreme court united states v. huck manufacturing co., 382 u.s. 197 (1965) 382 u.s. 197 united states v. huck manufacturing co. et al. appeal from the united states district court for the eastern district of michigan. no. 8. argued november 15, 1965. decided december 6, 1965. 227 f. supp. 791, affirmed. assistant attorney general turner argued the cause for the united states. with him on the brief were acting solicitor general spritzer, frank goodman and robert b. hummel. dennis g. lyons and thomas w. pomeroy, jr., argued the cause for appellees. with them on the brief were paul a. porter, william l. mcgovern, john a. blair, s. k. mccune and w. walter braham, jr. .....
Judgment:
UNITED STATES v. HUCK MANUFACTURING CO. - 382 U.S. 197 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court UNITED STATES v. HUCK MANUFACTURING CO., 382 U.S. 197 (1965) 382 U.S. 197

UNITED STATES v. HUCK MANUFACTURING CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
MICHIGAN. No. 8.
Argued November 15, 1965.
Decided December 6, 1965.

227 F. Supp. 791, affirmed.

Assistant Attorney General Turner argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Frank Goodman and Robert B. Hummel.

Dennis G. Lyons and Thomas W. Pomeroy, Jr., argued the cause for appellees. With them on the brief were Paul A. Porter, William L. McGovern, John A. Blair, S. K. McCune and W. Walter Braham, Jr.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 382 U.S. 197, 198




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //