Skip to content


Nehring Vs. Gerrity - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number382 U.S. 202
AppellantNehring
RespondentGerrity
Excerpt:
.....of illinois. no. 614. decided december 6, 1965. 31 ill. 2d 608, 203 n. e. 2d 402, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 382 u.s. 202, 203 california democratic council v. arnebergh, 382 u.s. 202 (1965) 382 u.s. 202 (1965) "> u.s. supreme court california democratic council v. arnebergh, 382 u.s. 202 (1965) 382 u.s. 202 california democratic council et al. v. arnebergh et al. appeal from the district court of appeal of california, second appellate district. no. 583. decided december 6, 1965. 233 cal. app. 2d 425,.....
Judgment:
NEHRING v. GERRITY - 382 U.S. 202 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court NEHRING v. GERRITY, 382 U.S. 202 (1965) 382 U.S. 202

NEHRING v. GERRITY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 614.
Decided December 6, 1965.

31 Ill. 2d 608, 203 N. E. 2d 402, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 382 U.S. 202, 203


CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC COUNCIL v. ARNEBERGH, <a href="/101046"> 382 U.S. 202 </a> (1965) 382 U.S. 202 (1965) "> U.S. Supreme Court CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC COUNCIL v. ARNEBERGH, 382 U.S. 202 (1965) 382 U.S. 202

CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC COUNCIL ET AL. v. ARNEBERGH ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 583.
Decided December 6, 1965.

233 Cal. App. 2d 425, 43 Cal. Rptr. 531, appeal dismissed.

Leon M. Cooper for appellants.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Charles A. Barrett, Assistant Attorney General, Sanford N. Gruskin, Deputy Attorney General, Harold W. Kennedy, Roger Arnebergh, pro se, and Bourke Jones for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //