Skip to content


Solomon Vs. South Carolina - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number382 U.S. 204
AppellantSolomon
RespondentSouth Carolina
Excerpt:
solomon v. south carolina - 382 u.s. 204 (1965) u.s. supreme court solomon v. south carolina, 382 u.s. 204 (1965) 382 u.s. 204 solomon v. south carolina. appeal from the supreme court of south carolina. no. 588. decided december 6, 1965. 245 s. c. 550, 141 s. e. 2d 818, appeal dismissed. ellis lyons for appellant. daniel r. mcleod, attorney general of south carolina, and e. n. brandon, assistant attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice douglas is of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed on the authority of sherbert v. verner, 374 u.s. 398 . and see mcgowan v. maryland, 366 u.s. 420,.....
Judgment:
SOLOMON v. SOUTH CAROLINA - 382 U.S. 204 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court SOLOMON v. SOUTH CAROLINA, 382 U.S. 204 (1965) 382 U.S. 204

SOLOMON v. SOUTH CAROLINA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
No. 588.
Decided December 6, 1965.

245 S. C. 550, 141 S. E. 2d 818, appeal dismissed.

Ellis Lyons for appellant.

Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and E. N. Brandon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed on the authority of Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 . And see McGowan v. Maryland, 366 U.S. 420, 561 , 577 (dissenting opinion).

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 382 U.S. 204, 205




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //