Skip to content


Kasharian Vs. Wilentz - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number382 U.S. 161
AppellantKasharian
RespondentWilentz
Excerpt:
.....writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 382 u.s. 161, 162 florida east coast railway co. v. united states, 382 u.s. 161 (1965) 382 u.s. 161 (1965) "> u.s. supreme court florida east coast railway co. v. united states, 382 u.s. 161 (1965) 382 u.s. 161 florida east coast railway co. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the middle district of florida. no. 541. decided november 22, 1965. 242 f. supp. 490, affirmed. a. alvis layne and fred h. kent for appellant. solicitor general marshall, assistant attorney general turner, robert b. hummel and robert w. ginnane for the united states et al.; prime f. osborn and phil c. beverly for atlantic coast line railroad co.; and.....
Judgment:
KASHARIAN v. WILENTZ - 382 U.S. 161 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court KASHARIAN v. WILENTZ, 382 U.S. 161 (1965) 382 U.S. 161

KASHARIAN v. WILENTZ.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 672, Misc.
Decided November 22, 1965.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 382 U.S. 161, 162


FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/101055"> 382 U.S. 161 </a> (1965) 382 U.S. 161 (1965) "> U.S. Supreme Court FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO. v. UNITED STATES, 382 U.S. 161 (1965) 382 U.S. 161

FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF
FLORIDA. No. 541.
Decided November 22, 1965.

242 F. Supp. 490, affirmed.

A. Alvis Layne and Fred H. Kent for appellant.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert B. Hummel and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al.; Prime F. Osborn and Phil C. Beverly for Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.; and William H. Maness for A. Duda & Sons, Inc., et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //