Skip to content


Burnham Van Service Vs. Pentecost - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number382 U.S. 106
AppellantBurnham Van Service
RespondentPentecost
Excerpt:
.....federal question. page 382 u.s. 106, 107 alabama highway express, inc. v. united states, 382 u.s. 106 (1965) 382 u.s. 106 (1965) "> u.s. supreme court alabama highway express, inc. v. united states, 382 u.s. 106 (1965) 382 u.s. 106 alabama highway express, inc., et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of alabama. no. 447. decided november 15, 1965. 241 f. supp. 290, affirmed. james w. wrape and robert e. joyner for appellants. solicitor general marshall, assistant attorney general turner, robert b. hummel, robert w. ginnane and robert s. burk for the united states et al. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the.....
Judgment:
BURNHAM VAN SERVICE v. PENTECOST - 382 U.S. 106 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court BURNHAM VAN SERVICE v. PENTECOST, 382 U.S. 106 (1965) 382 U.S. 106

BURNHAM VAN SERVICE ET AL. v. PENTECOST ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE.
No. 494.
Decided November 15, 1965.

Appeal dismissed.

J. G. Lackey, Jr., for appellants.

George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Milton P. Rice, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 382 U.S. 106, 107


ALABAMA HIGHWAY EXPRESS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/101059"> 382 U.S. 106 </a> (1965) 382 U.S. 106 (1965) "> U.S. Supreme Court ALABAMA HIGHWAY EXPRESS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 382 U.S. 106 (1965) 382 U.S. 106

ALABAMA HIGHWAY EXPRESS, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ALABAMA. No. 447.
Decided November 15, 1965.

241 F. Supp. 290, affirmed.

James W. Wrape and Robert E. Joyner for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Robert S. Burk for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //