Skip to content


Fernandez Vs. Babare - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number382 U.S. 107
AppellantFernandez
RespondentBabare
Excerpt:
..... appeal from the supreme court of oregon. no. 610, misc. decided november 15, 1965. appeal dismissed. howard r. lonergan for appellant. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 382 u.s. 107, 108 michigan bell telephone co. v. city of detroit, 382 u.s. 107 (1965) 382 u.s. 107 (1965) "> u.s. supreme court michigan bell telephone co. v. city of detroit, 382 u.s. 107 (1965) 382 u.s. 107 michigan bell telephone co. v. city of detroit. appeal from the supreme court of michigan. no. 497. decided november 15, 1965. * [ footnote * ] together with no. 498, detroit edison co. v. city of detroit, also on appeal from the same court. 374.....
Judgment:
FERNANDEZ v. BABARE - 382 U.S. 107 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court FERNANDEZ v. BABARE, 382 U.S. 107 (1965) 382 U.S. 107

FERNANDEZ v. BABARE ET UX.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON.
No. 610, Misc.
Decided November 15, 1965.

Appeal dismissed.

Howard R. Lonergan for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 382 U.S. 107, 108


MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE CO. v. CITY OF DETROIT, <a href="/101060"> 382 U.S. 107 </a> (1965) 382 U.S. 107 (1965) "> U.S. Supreme Court MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE CO. v. CITY OF DETROIT, 382 U.S. 107 (1965) 382 U.S. 107

MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE CO. v. CITY OF DETROIT.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 497.
Decided November 15, 1965. *

[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 498, Detroit Edison Co. v. City of Detroit, also on appeal from the same court.

374 Mich. 543, 132 N. W. 2d 660, appeals dismissed and certiorari denied.

Thomas G. Long, James M. Smith and Donald E. Brown for appellant in No. 497. Harvey A. Fischer and Richard Ford for appellant in No. 498.

John H. Witherspoon for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeals were taken as petitions for writs of certiorari, certiorari is denied.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //