Skip to content


Richmond Television Corp. Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number382 U.S. 68
AppellantRichmond Television Corp.
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
richmond television corp. v. united states - 382 u.s. 68 (1965) u.s. supreme court richmond television corp. v. united states, 382 u.s. 68 (1965) richmond television corp. v. united states no. 420 decided november 8, 1965 382 u.s. 68 on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fourth circuit certiorari granted; 345 f.2d 901 vacated and remanded. per curiam. the petition for writ of certiorari is granted. in the light of the representations of the solicitor general and an independent examination of the record, we believe that the court of appeals for the fourth circuit was mistaken in its view that petitioner's amortization claims for the taxable years 1956 and 1957 were not properly.....
Judgment:
Richmond Television Corp. v. United States - 382 U.S. 68 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court Richmond Television Corp. v. United States, 382 U.S. 68 (1965)

Richmond Television Corp. v. United States

No. 420

Decided November 8, 1965

382 U.S. 68

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Certiorari granted; 345 F.2d 901 vacated and remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. In the light of the representations of the Solicitor General and an independent examination of the record, we believe that the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit was mistaken in its view that petitioner's amortization claims for the taxable years 1956 and 1957 were not properly before it. Although the record is not free from ambiguity, we take the Court of Appeals to have based its decision on the ground that the petitioner's amortization claims derived solely from net operating loss deductions carried forward from prior years, and that no additional amortization deductions for 1956 and 1957 were sought. Since we find that the petitioner adequately presented its amortization claims for 1956 and 1957, we vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand the case to that court for the consideration of those claims, without intimation of any kind as to their merit.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //