Skip to content


Jobe Vs. City of Erlanger - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number382 U.S. 12
AppellantJobe
RespondentCity of Erlanger
Excerpt:
.....is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. aluminum co. of america v. united states, 382 u.s. 12 (1965) 382 u.s. 12 (1965) "> u.s. supreme court aluminum co. of america v. united states, 382 u.s. 12 (1965) 382 u.s. 12 aluminum co. of america et al. v. united states. appeal from the united states district court for the eastern district of missouri. no. 84. decided october 11, 1965. 233 f. supp. 718; 247 f. supp. 308, affirmed. herbert a. bergson, howard adler, jr., daniel h. margolis and william k. unverzagt for appellants. solicitor general cox, acting assistant attorney general wright, lionel kestenbaum, jerry z. pruzansky and edna lingreen for the united states. per curiam. the motion.....
Judgment:
JOBE v. CITY OF ERLANGER - 382 U.S. 12 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court JOBE v. CITY OF ERLANGER, 382 U.S. 12 (1965) 382 U.S. 12

JOBE ET AL. v. CITY OF ERLANGER.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY.
No. 62.
Decided October 11, 1965.

383 S. W. 2d 675, appeal dismissed.

James C. Ware for appellants.

Harry L. Riggs, Jr., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/101086"> 382 U.S. 12 </a> (1965) 382 U.S. 12 (1965) "> U.S. Supreme Court ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA v. UNITED STATES, 382 U.S. 12 (1965) 382 U.S. 12

ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA ET AL. v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
MISSOURI. No. 84.
Decided October 11, 1965.

233 F. Supp. 718; 247 F. Supp. 308, affirmed.

Herbert A. Bergson, Howard Adler, Jr., Daniel H. Margolis and William K. Unverzagt for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Wright, Lionel Kestenbaum, Jerry Z. Pruzansky and Edna Lingreen for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 382 U.S. 12, 13




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //