Skip to content


Herald Publishing Co. Vs. Whitehead-donovan Corp. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number382 U.S. 13
AppellantHerald Publishing Co.
RespondentWhitehead-donovan Corp.
Excerpt:
.....justice harlan is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. bowman v. lake county public building commission, 382 u.s. 13 (1965) 382 u.s. 13 (1965) "> u.s. supreme court bowman v. lake county public building commission, 382 u.s. 13 (1965) 382 u.s. 13 bowman v. lake county public building commission et al. appeal from the supreme court of illinois. no. 170. decided october 11, 1965. 31 ill. 2d 575, 203 n. e. 2d 129, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. paul e. hamer for appellant. andrew a. semmelman and bruno w. stanczak for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as.....
Judgment:
HERALD PUBLISHING CO. v. WHITEHEAD-DONOVAN CORP. - 382 U.S. 13 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court HERALD PUBLISHING CO. v. WHITEHEAD-DONOVAN CORP., 382 U.S. 13 (1965) 382 U.S. 13

HERALD PUBLISHING CO. v. WHITEHEAD-DONOVAN CORP.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 156.
Decided October 11, 1965.

62 Cal. 2d 185, 397 P.2d 426, appeal dismissed.

James G. Butler for appellant.

George G. Shapitric for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


BOWMAN v. LAKE COUNTY PUBLIC BUILDING COMMISSION, <a href="/101087"> 382 U.S. 13 </a> (1965) 382 U.S. 13 (1965) "> U.S. Supreme Court BOWMAN v. LAKE COUNTY PUBLIC BUILDING COMMISSION, 382 U.S. 13 (1965) 382 U.S. 13

BOWMAN v. LAKE COUNTY PUBLIC BUILDING COMMISSION ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 170.
Decided October 11, 1965.

31 Ill. 2d 575, 203 N. E. 2d 129, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Paul E. Hamer for appellant.

Andrew A. Semmelman and Bruno W. Stanczak for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 382 U.S. 13, 14




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //