Skip to content


O'CONNOR Vs. OHiO - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number382 U.S. 19
AppellantO'CONNOR
RespondentOHiO
Excerpt:
.....as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 382 u.s. 19, 20 alamo express, inc. v. united states, 382 u.s. 19 (1965) 382 u.s. 19 (1965) "> u.s. supreme court alamo express, inc. v. united states, 382 u.s. 19 (1965) 382 u.s. 19 alamo express, inc., et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the western district of texas. no. 357. decided october 11, 1965. 239 f. supp. 694, affirmed. reagan sayers and ewell h. muse, jr., for appellants. acting solicitor general spritzer, assistant attorney general turner, lionel kestenbaum, robert w. ginnane and arthur j. cerra for the united states et al. william e. cureton for appellees central freight lines, inc., et.....
Judgment:
O'CONNOR v. OHIO - 382 U.S. 19 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court O'CONNOR v. OHIO, 382 U.S. 19 (1965) 382 U.S. 19

O'CONNOR v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 281, Misc.
Decided October 11, 1965.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

James W. Cowell for appellant.

Harry Friberg for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 382 U.S. 19, 20


ALAMO EXPRESS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/101093"> 382 U.S. 19 </a> (1965) 382 U.S. 19 (1965) "> U.S. Supreme Court ALAMO EXPRESS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 382 U.S. 19 (1965) 382 U.S. 19

ALAMO EXPRESS, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
TEXAS. No. 357.
Decided October 11, 1965.

239 F. Supp. 694, affirmed.

Reagan Sayers and Ewell H. Muse, Jr., for appellants.

Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and Arthur J. Cerra for the United States et al. William E. Cureton for appellees Central Freight Lines, Inc., et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //