Skip to content


Pugach Vs. New York - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number382 U.S. 20
AppellantPugach
RespondentNew York
Excerpt:
.....should be granted. page 382 u.s. 20, 21 price v. state road commission of west virginia, 382 u.s. 20 (1965) 382 u.s. 20 (1965) "> u.s. supreme court price v. state road commission of west virginia, 382 u.s. 20 (1965) 382 u.s. 20 price, dba howard price & co. v. state road commission of west virginia et al. appeal from the circuit court of kanawha county, west virginia. no. 144. decided october 11, 1965. appeal dismissed. carney m. layne and charles w. yeager for appellant. c. donald robertson, attorney general of west virginia, and philip j. graziani and c. robert sarver, assistant attorneys general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed in.....
Judgment:
PUGACH v. NEW YORK - 382 U.S. 20 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court PUGACH v. NEW YORK, 382 U.S. 20 (1965) 382 U.S. 20

PUGACH v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 12, Misc.
Decided October 11, 1965.

15 N. Y. 2d 65, 204 N. E. 2d 176, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

Page 382 U.S. 20, 21


PRICE v. STATE ROAD COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA, <a href="/101094"> 382 U.S. 20 </a> (1965) 382 U.S. 20 (1965) "> U.S. Supreme Court PRICE v. STATE ROAD COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA, 382 U.S. 20 (1965) 382 U.S. 20

PRICE, DBA HOWARD PRICE & CO. v. STATE ROAD COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF KANAWHA COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA. No. 144.
Decided October 11, 1965.

Appeal dismissed.

Carney M. Layne and Charles W. Yeager for appellant.

C. Donald Robertson, Attorney General of West Virginia, and Philip J. Graziani and C. Robert Sarver, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed in light of the representations of the Attorney General of West Virginia that there is open to the appellant an effective state procedure of which he has not availed himself.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //