Skip to content


Associated Food Retailers, Great. Chicago, Vs. Jewel Tea - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number381 U.S. 761
AppellantAssociated Food Retailers, Great. Chicago,
RespondentJewel Tea
Excerpt:
.....great. chicago, v. jewel tea - 381 u.s. 761 (1965) u.s. supreme court associated food retailers, great. chicago, v. jewel tea, 381 u.s. 761 (1965) 381 u.s. 761 associated food retailers of greater chicago, inc., et al. v. jewel tea co., inc. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit. no. 321. decided june 7, 1965. certiorari granted and judgment reversed. reported below: 331 f.2d 547 . eugene kart for petitioners. george b. christensen, fred h. daugherty, theodore a. groenke and samuel weisbard for respondent. solicitor general cox for the united states, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition. per curiam. the petition for writ of certiorari is.....
Judgment:
ASSOCIATED FOOD RETAILERS, GREAT. CHICAGO, v. JEWEL TEA - 381 U.S. 761 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court ASSOCIATED FOOD RETAILERS, GREAT. CHICAGO, v. JEWEL TEA, 381 U.S. 761 (1965) 381 U.S. 761

ASSOCIATED FOOD RETAILERS OF GREATER CHICAGO, INC., ET AL. v.
JEWEL TEA CO., INC.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 321.
Decided June 7, 1965.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Reported below: 331 F.2d 547 .

Eugene Kart for petitioners.

George B. Christensen, Fred H. Daugherty, Theodore A. Groenke and Samuel Weisbard for respondent.

Solicitor General Cox for the United States, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment below is reversed. Meat Cutters v. Jewel Tea, ante, p. 676.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, MR. JUSTICE STEWART and MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG concur in the judgment of the Court for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG'S opinion in United Mine Workers of America v. Pennington and Meat Cutters v. Jewel Tea, ante, at 697.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE CLARK dissent.

Page 381 U.S. 761, 762




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //