Skip to content


United States Vs. Leiter Minerals, Inc. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number381 U.S. 413
AppellantUnited States
RespondentLeiter Minerals, Inc.
Excerpt:
united states v. leiter minerals, inc. - 381 u.s. 413 (1965) u.s. supreme court united states v. leiter minerals, inc., 381 u.s. 413 (1965) 381 u.s. 413 united states v. leiter minerals, inc., et al. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit. no. 950. decided june 1, 1965. * [ footnote * ] together with no. 951, california co. et al. v. leiter minerals, inc., et al., also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same court. certiorari granted, judgment vacated and cases remanded to district court with directions to dismiss the complaint as moot. reported below: 329 f.2d 85 . solicitor general cox and roger p. marquis for the united states. francis r. kirkham,.....
Judgment:
UNITED STATES v. LEITER MINERALS, INC. - 381 U.S. 413 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court UNITED STATES v. LEITER MINERALS, INC., 381 U.S. 413 (1965) 381 U.S. 413

UNITED STATES v. LEITER MINERALS, INC., ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 950.
Decided June 1, 1965. *

[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 951, California Co. et al. v. Leiter Minerals, Inc., et al., also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same court.

Certiorari granted, judgment vacated and cases remanded to District Court with directions to dismiss the complaint as moot.

Reported below: 329 F.2d 85 .

Solicitor General Cox and Roger P. Marquis for the United States.

Francis R. Kirkham, Turner H. McBaine, Eugene D. Saunders and Charles D. Marshall for petitioners in No. 951.

Saul Stone and E. Drew McKinnis for Buras et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of Alma Buras et al. to be added as parties respondent is granted.

Upon consideration of the joint suggestion of mootness, the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is vacated. The cases are remanded to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana with directions to dismiss the complaint as moot.

Page 381 U.S. 413, 414




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //