Skip to content


Fox Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number381 U.S. 436
AppellantFox
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
.....motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. page 381 u.s. 436, 437 motor convoy, inc., v. united states, 381 u.s. 436 (1965) 381 u.s. 436 (1965) "> u.s. supreme court motor convoy, inc., v. united states, 381 u.s. 436 (1965) 381 u.s. 436 motor convoy, inc., et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of georgia. no. 987. decided june 1, 1965. 235 f. supp. 250, affirmed. paul m. daniell, robert e. born and martin sack for appellants. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general orrick, robert b. hummel, robert w. ginnane and betty jo christian for the united states et al.; george s. dixon for national automobile transporters.....
Judgment:
FOX v. UNITED STATES - 381 U.S. 436 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court FOX v. UNITED STATES, 381 U.S. 436 (1965) 381 U.S. 436

FOX v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
LOUISIANA. No. 1032.
Decided June 1, 1965.

Affirmed.

Sidney W. Provensal, Jr., for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 381 U.S. 436, 437


MOTOR CONVOY, INC., v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/101123"> 381 U.S. 436 </a> (1965) 381 U.S. 436 (1965) "> U.S. Supreme Court MOTOR CONVOY, INC., v. UNITED STATES, 381 U.S. 436 (1965) 381 U.S. 436

MOTOR CONVOY, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT
OF GEORGIA. No. 987.
Decided June 1, 1965.

235 F. Supp. 250, affirmed.

Paul M. Daniell, Robert E. Born and Martin Sack for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al.; George S. Dixon for National Automobile Transporters Association; and Nelson M. Harris, Jr., for Dixie Transport Co., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //