Skip to content


Turney Vs. Arkansas - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number381 U.S. 276
AppellantTurney
RespondentArkansas
Excerpt:
..... appeal from the supreme court of arkansas. no. 967. decided may 17, 1965. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 237 ark. 569, 375 s. w. 2d 375. thomas j. gentry for appellant. bruce bennett, attorney general of arkansas, and richard b. adkisson, chief assistant attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. mckinley v. reilly, 381 u.s. 276 (1965) 381 u.s. 276 (1965) "> u.s. supreme court mckinley v. reilly, 381 u.s. 276 (1965) 381 u.s. 276 mckinley v. reilly et al. appeal from the.....
Judgment:
TURNEY v. ARKANSAS - 381 U.S. 276 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court TURNEY v. ARKANSAS, 381 U.S. 276 (1965) 381 U.S. 276

TURNEY v. ARKANSAS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS.
No. 967.
Decided May 17, 1965.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 237 Ark. 569, 375 S. W. 2d 375.

Thomas J. Gentry for appellant.

Bruce Bennett, Attorney General of Arkansas, and Richard B. Adkisson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


McKINLEY v. REILLY, <a href="/101140"> 381 U.S. 276 </a> (1965) 381 U.S. 276 (1965) "> U.S. Supreme Court McKINLEY v. REILLY, 381 U.S. 276 (1965) 381 U.S. 276

McKINLEY v. REILLY ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
No. 1000.
Decided May 17, 1965.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 96 Ariz. 176, 393 P.2d 268.

Mark Wilmer for appellant.

Darrell F. Smith, Attorney General of Arizona, Phillip M. Haggerty and Jerry W. Lawson, Assistant Attorneys General, and John E. Madden, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 381 U.S. 276, 277




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //