Skip to content


Mcclellan Vs. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Co. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number381 U.S. 130
AppellantMcclellan
RespondentChesapeake and Ohio Railway Co.
Excerpt:
mcclellan v. chesapeake & ohio railway co. - 381 u.s. 130 (1965) u.s. supreme court mcclellan v. chesapeake & ohio railway co., 381 u.s. 130 (1965) 381 u.s. 130 mcclellan v. chesapeake & ohio railway co. appeal from the court of appeals of ohio, cuyahoga county. no. 994. decided may 3, 1965. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. richard m. markus for appellant. john g. cardinal and edwin knachel for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 381 u.s. 130, 131
Judgment:
McCLELLAN v. CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY CO. - 381 U.S. 130 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court McCLELLAN v. CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY CO., 381 U.S. 130 (1965) 381 U.S. 130

McCLELLAN v. CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY CO.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, CUYAHOGA COUNTY.
No. 994.
Decided May 3, 1965.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Richard M. Markus for appellant.

John G. Cardinal and Edwin Knachel for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 381 U.S. 130, 131




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //