Skip to content


Corpora Vs. New York - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number380 U.S. 520
AppellantCorpora
RespondentNew York
Excerpt:
.....is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 380 u.s. 520, 521 gold v. dicarlo, 380 u.s. 520 (1965) 380 u.s. 520 (1965) "> u.s. supreme court gold v. dicarlo, 380 u.s. 520 (1965) 380 u.s. 520 gold et al. v. dicarlo, commissioner of licenses of city of new york, et al. appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of new york. no. 901. decided april 26, 1965. 235 f. supp. 817, affirmed. jesse moss for appellants. leo a. larkin and seymour b. quel for dicarlo, and louis j. lefkowitz, attorney general of new york, pro se, samuel a. hirshowitz, first assistant attorney general, and lester esterman, assistant attorney general, for lefkowitz, appellees. per curiam. .....
Judgment:
CORPORA v. NEW YORK - 380 U.S. 520 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court CORPORA v. NEW YORK, 380 U.S. 520 (1965) 380 U.S. 520

CORPORA v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 934.
Decided April 26, 1965.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Emanuel Redfield for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan and H. Richard Uviller for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 380 U.S. 520, 521


GOLD v. DiCARLO, <a href="/101171"> 380 U.S. 520 </a> (1965) 380 U.S. 520 (1965) "> U.S. Supreme Court GOLD v. DiCARLO, 380 U.S. 520 (1965) 380 U.S. 520

GOLD ET AL. v. DiCARLO, COMMISSIONER OF LICENSES OF CITY OF NEW YORK,
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 901.
Decided April 26, 1965.

235 F. Supp. 817, affirmed.

Jesse Moss for appellants.

Leo A. Larkin and Seymour B. Quel for DiCarlo, and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Lester Esterman, Assistant Attorney General, for Lefkowitz, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //