Skip to content


Cumberland Farms Northern Vs. Maine Milk Commission - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number380 U.S. 521
AppellantCumberland Farms Northern
RespondentMaine Milk Commission
Excerpt:
.....milk commission - 380 u.s. 521 (1965) u.s. supreme court cumberland farms northern v. maine milk commission, 380 u.s. 521 (1965) 380 u.s. 521 cumberland farms northern, inc. v. maine milk commission. appeal from the supreme judicial court of maine. no. 904. decided april 26, 1965. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 160 me. 367, 205 a. 2d 146. sidney w. wernick for appellant. richard j. dubord, attorney general of maine, george c. west, deputy attorney general, and john w. benoit, assistant attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. brown v. california, 380 u.s. 521 .....
Judgment:
CUMBERLAND FARMS NORTHERN v. MAINE MILK COMMISSION - 380 U.S. 521 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court CUMBERLAND FARMS NORTHERN v. MAINE MILK COMMISSION, 380 U.S. 521 (1965) 380 U.S. 521

CUMBERLAND FARMS NORTHERN, INC. v. MAINE MILK COMMISSION.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE.
No. 904.
Decided April 26, 1965.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 160 Me. 367, 205 A. 2d 146.

Sidney W. Wernick for appellant.

Richard J. Dubord, Attorney General of Maine, George C. West, Deputy Attorney General, and John W. Benoit, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


BROWN v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="/101172"> 380 U.S. 521 </a> (1965) 380 U.S. 521 (1965) "> U.S. Supreme Court BROWN v. CALIFORNIA, 380 U.S. 521 (1965) 380 U.S. 521

BROWN v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 194, Misc.
Decided April 26, 1965.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Lawrence R. Tapper, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 380 U.S. 521, 522




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //