Skip to content


Abernathy Vs. Alabama - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number380 U.S. 447
AppellantAbernathy
RespondentAlabama
Excerpt:
.....of alabama. no. 9. argued october 12-13, 1964. decided april 5, 1965. 42 ala. app. 149, 155 so.2d 586, reversed. louis h. pollak argued the cause for petitioners. with him on the brief were jack greenberg, constance baker motley, james m. nabrit iii, fred d. gray and charles s. conley. leslie hall, assistant attorney general of alabama, argued the cause for respondent. with him on the brief was richmond m. flowers, attorney general of alabama. per curiam. the judgments are reversed. boynton v. virginia, 364 u.s. 454 . mr. justice black and mr. justice white took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 380 u.s. 447, 448
Judgment:
ABERNATHY v. ALABAMA - 380 U.S. 447 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court ABERNATHY v. ALABAMA, 380 U.S. 447 (1965) 380 U.S. 447

ABERNATHY ET AL. v. ALABAMA.
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF ALABAMA.
No. 9.
Argued October 12-13, 1964.
Decided April 5, 1965.

42 Ala. App. 149, 155 So.2d 586, reversed.

Louis H. Pollak argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, James M. Nabrit III, Fred D. Gray and Charles S. Conley.

Leslie Hall, Assistant Attorney General of Alabama, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Richmond M. Flowers, Attorney General of Alabama.

PER CURIAM.

The judgments are reversed. Boynton v. Virginia, 364 U.S. 454 .

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 380 U.S. 447, 448




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //