Skip to content


U.S. A. C. Transport Inc. Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number380 U.S. 450
AppellantU.S. A. C. Transport Inc.
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
u.s. a. c. transport inc. v. united states - 380 u.s. 450 (1965) u.s. supreme court u.s. a. c. transport inc. v. united states, 380 u.s. 450 (1965) 380 u.s. 450 u.s. a. c. transport, inc. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of delaware. no. 856. decided april 5, 1965. 235 f. supp. 689, affirmed. paul f. sullivan for appellant. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general orrick, robert b. hummel, jerry z. pruzansky, robert w. ginnane and betty jo christian for the united states et al. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. page 380 u.s. 450, 451
Judgment:
U.S. A. C. TRANSPORT INC. v. UNITED STATES - 380 U.S. 450 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court U.S. A. C. TRANSPORT INC. v. UNITED STATES, 380 U.S. 450 (1965) 380 U.S. 450

U.S. A. C. TRANSPORT, INC. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.
No. 856.
Decided April 5, 1965.

235 F. Supp. 689, affirmed.

Paul F. Sullivan for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Jerry Z. Pruzansky, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 380 U.S. 450, 451




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //