Skip to content


Trans-lux Dist. Corp. Vs. Board of Regents Univ. N. Y. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number380 U.S. 259
AppellantTrans-lux Dist. Corp.
RespondentBoard of Regents Univ. N. Y.
Excerpt:
trans-lux dist. corp. v. board of regents univ. n. y. - 380 u.s. 259 (1965) u.s. supreme court trans-lux dist. corp. v. board of regents univ. n. y., 380 u.s. 259 (1965) 380 u.s. 259 trans-lux distributing corp. v. board of regents of the university of new york. appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 314. decided march 15, 1965. 14 n. y. 2d 88, 198 n. e. 2d 242, reversed. harry i. rand for appellant. charles a. brind for appellee. per curiam. the judgment is reversed. freedman v. maryland, ante, p. 51. santos v. texas, 380 u.s. 259 (1965) 380 u.s. 259 (1965) "> u.s. supreme court santos v. texas, 380 u.s. 259 (1965) 380 u.s. 259 santos v. texas. on petition for writ.....
Judgment:
TRANS-LUX DIST. CORP. v. BOARD OF REGENTS UNIV. N. Y. - 380 U.S. 259 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court TRANS-LUX DIST. CORP. v. BOARD OF REGENTS UNIV. N. Y., 380 U.S. 259 (1965) 380 U.S. 259

TRANS-LUX DISTRIBUTING CORP. v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE
UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 314.
Decided March 15, 1965.

14 N. Y. 2d 88, 198 N. E. 2d 242, reversed.

Harry I. Rand for appellant.

Charles A. Brind for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed. Freedman v. Maryland, ante, p. 51.


SANTOS v. TEXAS, <a href="/101198"> 380 U.S. 259 </a> (1965) 380 U.S. 259 (1965) "> U.S. Supreme Court SANTOS v. TEXAS, 380 U.S. 259 (1965) 380 U.S. 259

SANTOS v. TEXAS.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL
APPEALS OF TEXAS. No. 340, Misc.
Decided March 15, 1965.

Certiorari granted, judgment vacated and case remanded.

Reported below: 379 S. W. 2d 667.

Orville A. Harlan for petitioner.

Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, and Howard M. Fender, Gilbert J. Pena and Allo B. Crow, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas for further consideration in light of the opinion of this Court in Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 .

Page 380 U.S. 259, 260




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //