Skip to content


Marvel Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number380 U.S. 262
AppellantMarvel
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
marvel v. united states - 380 u.s. 262 (1965) u.s. supreme court marvel v. united states, 380 u.s. 262 (1965) 380 u.s. 262 marvel v. united states. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit. no. 476, misc. decided march 15, 1965. certiorari granted, judgment vacated and case remanded. reported below: 335 f.2d 101 . petitioner pro se. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general miller, beatrice rosenberg and theodore george gilinsky for the united states. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the united states district court for the.....
Judgment:
MARVEL v. UNITED STATES - 380 U.S. 262 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court MARVEL v. UNITED STATES, 380 U.S. 262 (1965) 380 U.S. 262

MARVEL v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 476, Misc.
Decided March 15, 1965.

Certiorari granted, judgment vacated and case remanded.

Reported below: 335 F.2d 101 .

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Theodore George Gilinsky for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama for a hearing as to whether petitioner was misled by the trial judge as to the maximum sentence.

Page 380 U.S. 262, 263




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //