Skip to content


Davis Vs. Mabry - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number380 U.S. 251
AppellantDavis
RespondentMabry
Excerpt:
davis v. mabry - 380 u.s. 251 (1965) u.s. supreme court davis v. mabry, 380 u.s. 251 (1965) 380 u.s. 251 davis, assessor-collector of taxes, bexar county, texas, et al. v. mabry et al. appeal from the united states district court for the western district of texas. no. 774. decided march 8, 1965. 232 f. supp. 930, affirmed. waggoner carr, attorney general of texas, hawthorne phillips, first assistant attorney general, mary k. wall, assistant attorney general, james e. barlow and preston h. dial, jr., for appellants. per curiam. the judgment is affirmed. carrington v. rash, ante, p. 89. mr. justice harlan would reverse the judgment of the district court for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in carrington v. rash,.....
Judgment:
DAVIS v. MABRY - 380 U.S. 251 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court DAVIS v. MABRY, 380 U.S. 251 (1965) 380 U.S. 251

DAVIS, ASSESSOR-COLLECTOR OF TAXES, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, ET AL. v.
MABRY ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 774.
Decided March 8, 1965.

232 F. Supp. 930, affirmed.

Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, Hawthorne Phillips, First Assistant Attorney General, Mary K. Wall, Assistant Attorney General, James E. Barlow and Preston H. Dial, Jr., for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed. Carrington v. Rash, ante, p. 89.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would reverse the judgment of the District Court for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Carrington v. Rash, ante, at 97.

Page 380 U.S. 251, 252




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //